Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« October 2003 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
foolishness
gloating
jerk fellation
LEGO
politics
schadenfreude
sports
Stinktown
work
We Three Jerks
Friday, 17 October 2003
I love the smell of blogging in the morning
I'll tell you this, I rooted for the Red Sox, but as I watched that game last night, watched Grady Little keep Pedro in to face Matsui when relief should have been brought in, it seemed like a movie whose ending you already knew. So, for now, Go Marlins...

Big problems in the Anglican Church. The British hierarchy are threatening a schism if the American church proceeds with its plans to consecrate that gay bishop from New Hampshire. Imagine, a schism in our day. Surely, these are great times...

Speaking of that quixotic state, a new poll conducted by former Democratic wunderkind Stanley Greenberg shows mixed feelings on the war in Iraq among Democratic voters in New Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina. According to the poll, voters want someone who supported the war in Iraq, but criticized President Bush's failure to precure international support. It wasn't clear in the article whether these numbers were from Democratic voters or likely Democratic voters, and that distinction will probably have an effect on these numbers.

AN excerpt from the article follows:

"Democrats surveyed in the three states also listed foreign policy and national security experience as the most important attribute they are looking for in selecting a nominee[Emphasis mine]. They rated that characteristic over such other choices as experience in Congress, being a decorated combat veteran, being a Washington outsider or having a blue-collar background." (Washington Post 10-17-03)

According to ESPN, the Giants have dropped their bid to host the 2008 Super Bowl and will rebid for 2009. That leaves Arizona, Washington and Tampa in the running. Although it would seem strange to host the Super Bowl in a cold climate, it has been done (See Super Bowl IV and any other Super Bowl at Tulane Stadium in New Orleans). I think it would probably be good for football and heck, it sounds like fun. It would certainly be better than playing in any kind of a dome. Weather is a part of football and to eliminate it as a factor in the biggest game of the year is stupid at best and sacrilege at worst.

A Big Dangerous Animal is in Trouble!

Enjoy,

Tony

Posted by thynkhard at 10:13 AM EDT
Updated: Friday, 17 October 2003 10:32 AM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink

Friday, 17 October 2003 - 2:19 PM EDT

Name: Shawn

Getting a Superbowl would be manageable, I think, but if we ever get an Olympics, I'll be taking a month-long vacation. (Now that I'm living in Silver Spring I'm getting a taste of this area's traffic (and it don't taste good).)

Saturday, 18 October 2003 - 10:46 AM EDT

Name: Marc

I think keeping Pedro in was the right choice. Do you pull Sandy Koufax or Jim Palmer to bring in Nameless Reliever? He is the ace and it's his job to get the big outs - he just didn't do it that time.

About the Anglicans read this Atlantic Monthly piece about a Nigerian archbishop opposed to the gay bishop and the secular liberalization of the church in general.

View Latest Entries