Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« February 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
foolishness
gloating
jerk fellation
LEGO
politics
schadenfreude
sports
Stinktown
work
We Three Jerks
Wednesday, 11 February 2004
Funeral attendance not Edwards cup of tea
With Wesley Clark dropping out of the race and Howard Dean holding on as long as possible in the hopes that Kerry does something stupid enough to derail his virtual lock on the nomination, the media has moved on to the second phase of the Democratic nominating process: The Veepstakes.

This turn of events spells the most trouble for North Carolina Senator John Edwards, whose campaign has, almost from the beginning, been dogged by questions about his feelings toward acceptng the VP slot. The youthful Edwards, who has repeatedly rebuffed this questions, is now being treated by most reporters as if he is, in effect, running for vice-president. But asking him this question over and over again, as today's Media Notes points out, is an exercise in futility.

If Edwards would say yes to this question it would mean the end of his campaign. If he says no he would make it all the more difficult to accept the nomination if it were offered to him.

Of course Edwards is considering a VP nomination. Why in the hell wouldn't he? He's young, he's not running again for the Senate and he could use the slot as a launching pad for 2008.

Here's the answer I think he should give:
Ted, Sam, George, Cokie, Tim, Bob, Wolf, Tom, Peter, Dan, Brit, I am focused and committed to the goal of becoming the next president because I truly believe that I can help bring about the real change that America needs and wants. If that does not happen, I would of course consider any opportunity to further serve my country.

Would people think this was bullshit? Maybe. But my gut tells me its closer than anything else he's said to the way he really feels

Tony

Posted by thynkhard at 12:30 PM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 11 February 2004 3:33 PM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink

Wednesday, 11 February 2004 - 1:30 PM EST

Name: Liz

Stephanopoulos really grilled him on this on Sunday--he asked at least three times. I'm tired of it as a question and I think Edwards must be, too. It stops being the number one question if he actually answers it as Tony suggests.

Wednesday, 11 February 2004 - 2:19 PM EST

Name: Marc

Not only is it a stupid question, it is also a colossally lazy question. I mean, how much thought does it take to come up with that question? Why not ask Edwards about the deficit, or whether the FCC should be worried about wardrobe malfunctions, or gay marriages, or anything fucking real? The media are lazy, self-fellating swine.

View Latest Entries