Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
foolishness
gloating
jerk fellation
LEGO
politics
schadenfreude
sports
Stinktown
work
We Three Jerks
Wednesday, 10 March 2004
John Kerry: Superfraud
Blogger's Note: This started out in the comment section, but then grew to post-size proportions.

"He is saying that he wants to be an activist president resolving many issues that are important to the African American community," Meeks said. "Kerry was simply stating that he wanted to follow in the footsteps of Clinton in addressing issues that are important to African Americans."

Actually, what I think Kerry is saying is: "I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing or how I got here."

Like a number of other Kerry moves, this comment strikes me as either exceedingly stupid or exceedingly cynical. Either he's too dumb to realize that, as a former Bonesman, he's going to look disingenuous at best, ridiculous at worst, if he portends to being able to understand the plight of black America. (Clinton, remember, was at least poor and from the South. Joe is more black than Kerry.) If Kerry's not that dumb then his comment is an example of pandering of the lowest kind.

It's good to see a black leader call one of these liberal, elitist, whiteies out. I'be been saying this for a while now, but one day it's going to be true: there will come a day when black people in this country will wake-up to the fact that the Democratic party takes them for granted.

Black Americans will grow tired of John Kerry's (who is just the latest example) pandering for votes and offering nothing in terms of ideas. They will realize that their cultural values are much more in line with the Republican Party than the Democratic Party. And they will look around their neighborhoods and notice that the Democratic welfare-state has failed them.

I honestly believe that Black America will continue to put itself in a precarious position if they continue to allow themselves to be in the back pocket of white Democratic candidates. Candidates that never seem all that concerned with black issues until they are running for something. I'm not saying that this calls, neccessarily, for defection from the Democratic Party. But as long as the party continues to act in such an insulting manner, defection could emerge as the only alternative.

I realize that these comments are a little controversial and I can imagine that I'm coming off as just another white guy who knows best. But my thoughts on this come from a look at reality, something John Kerry would be best to check in on.

Tony

Posted by thynkhard at 10:13 AM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink

Wednesday, 10 March 2004 - 11:42 AM EST

Name: Tony

Marc: Did you already use this headline? It sounds awfully familiar to me. I could go back and check, I guess, but I'm a lazy, lazy man, Roger.

Wednesday, 10 March 2004 - 1:52 PM EST

Name: Liz

It was John Zogby, Superfraud

https://thynkhard.tripod.com/three_jerks/index.blog?entry_id=209227

(Apologies to Marc for the unformatted link.)

Wednesday, 10 March 2004 - 2:33 PM EST

Name: None Of Your Business III, Esq.

a former Bonesman

There is no such thing as a former Bonesman.

Thursday, 11 March 2004 - 4:49 PM EST

Name: Marc

Lileks says Kerry's bloviations are a symptom of "Senatitus":


Kerry?s said some amusingly tone-deaf things lately ? wanting to be the second Black president, for example. I called it Senatitus in a Newhouse column ? a condition characterized by an unnatural belief in the unimpeachability of your every utterance. Twenty years of saying anything in a room full of rich guys who aren?t really listening has to have an effect on one?s ego. No one ever stands up and shouts Balderdash! Poppycock! Fatuous twaddle, sir, and if you persist in this infantile display of specious drivel I shall ask for you to meet me on the field of honor at dawn. No one ever says ?Hey, Bobby Byrd. Put a sock in it. Or put a hood over it. Whatever.? This might be why so few presidents have emerged from the Senate lately. Governors have to deal with state legislatures, whose composition ranges from the canny to the truly gruesome; they have to deal with local TV reporters. They have to deal with locals, period. Senators occasionally walk among the mortals, but they often have a hitch in their gait as through their robe snagged while descending Mt. Olympus.

Friday, 12 March 2004 - 8:46 AM EST

Name: Tony

This is as true and humorous an explanation of why Senators do not get elected president that I've heard. The crux of the matter is, as the author alludes to, governors must govern, while the entire purpose of the Senate is to deliberate. This is not to say that the Senate is a worthless body and its members not dedicated public servants (like any government institution, some are, some aren't), but it helps to show why, institutionally, Senators are at such a disadvantage when they squre off against governors in presidential elections.

View Latest Entries