Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
foolishness
gloating
jerk fellation
LEGO
politics
schadenfreude
sports
Stinktown
work
We Three Jerks
Tuesday, 16 March 2004
Jacques Kerry For Prime Minister
OK, now I'm convinced that John Kerry has lost his mind. A Boston Globe reporter gave Kerry a prime opportunity to back away from the claim that foreign leaders want him to beat George Bush. The Globe reporter, Patrick Healy, now says he made a mistake in transcribing the Kerry statement:
"I mistranscribed a key word," explains Patrick Healy, a political reporter for the BOSTON GLOBE who covered the event in a pool capacity.

"Listening to the audio recorder now, in the quiet of my house, I hear 'more leaders' and I am certain that 'more leaders' is what Senator Kerry said."

So what does Kerry do? He repeats the claim!
In a telephone interview, the Massachusetts senator and presumptive Democratic nominee said "it's no secret" that some countries are "deeply divided about our foreign policy. We have lost respect and influence in the world."

He continued: "I stand by my statement. The point is not the leaders. What's important is that this administration's foreign policy is not making us as safe as we can be in the world."

THIS is the issue that Kerry finally decides to have some backbone about? The one time in his life he isn't going to flip-flop? He's going to run as the guy who Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schroeder want to have in the White House? Sweet Jesus.

Marc

Posted by thynkhard at 10:57 AM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink

Tuesday, 16 March 2004 - 12:31 PM EST

Name: Tony

This is what I said about John Kerry on Saturday, March 6th:

Kerry has an advantage in the upcoming election that Democrats haven't had in a long time. The liberal base is energized and focused on winning, and has been willing to put some differences aside in their efforts to oust President Bush. If Kerry takes advantage of this and doesn't let Bob Shrum whisper in his ear too much, (and with the economy still struggling) he just might have a fighting chance.

Whether Kerry actually said foreign leaders or not seems irrelevant. After reading the quote in context, it seems that the word change would not change the sentiment. If not foreign leaders, to whom is Kerry referring to when he says "more leaders?" Governors?

The point of this isn't what Kerry really said. The point is what does Kerry mean. The problem here is not one of tactics, it is one of message. Because, in Kerry's mind, the fact that foreign leaders want him elected is a good reason for Americans to vote for him. But what Kerry fails to realize is that those voters who would be impressed that John Kerry is supported by Europe are already going to be voting for him. This quote does not help Kerry move to the center, nor is it an example of Kerry reaching out to moderate swing voters. Kerry still seems to be courting his base, maybe because he's determined to not let Nader hurt him the way he hurt Gore. But Nader in 2004 is not the Nader of 2000, and the Demoratic base is as energized and rallied around their nominee as they are likely to get.

Kerry's relectuance to move to the center is either naive or stupid, and probably a combination of both.

Tuesday, 16 March 2004 - 4:15 PM EST

Name: Marc

He definitely means what he said (for once). He missed a great chance to disavow the statement, and then he said it again.

Kerry must actually think people out there in West Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, etc. want to hear that a bunch of European socialists are supporting him. Try and find the last president who was elected on the basis of foreign support (and Clinton's Chinese money doesn't count - he had the sense to try and keep that a secret).

View Latest Entries