The Award For Most Fascist Logo In A Former Fascist Country Goes To...
The Berlin Thunder.

Marc

Gephardt goes after Dean
In a speech given to a group of Teamsters Gephardt accused Dean of sideing with Newt Gingrich during the Medicare, Medicaid debates of the mid-90s. I fear the Democrats are doing what I was worried about all along. In order to pander to their base their going to kill each other over who's more oppossed to reforming a government program badly in need of reform. Sometimes I think the Democratic primary voters are so out of touch with mainstream America that securing the Party's nomination is the worst thing that can happen to someone who wants to be president. I'd like Dean to stand up, prove his moderate credentials and drag his supporters to the electable center, but I don't think his numbers are strong enough yet. At the very least, this race is shaping up to be more exciting than Aunt Faye's world famous labor day watermelon salad.

Tony

more Plates..
This one is still just a bit unfinished...but I like to keep you want more...it involves a Red Sox Jersey

Death, rain, and Sigur Ros
Man...what a weird couple of days it's been. In a half awake haze, then this rain comes, then Mr. Cash kicks off...anyway.

Oh...Marc, you'll love this...and this is from the news a couple of days ago...but...since I can't keep anything in the front of my head for more than a fleeting moment...it is just coming out now.

Anyway. Supposedly the state is trying to crack down on the generally shoddy quality of the buses in this city. You both undestand exactly what I'm talking about...never on time, over crowded, falling apart (18 fucking wheels...what is that?) But, they've hired a new maintenance guy, and state wankers have been doing anonymous ride alongs just to audit the system...failures everywhere...here is the kicker though...those fucking bus driving card carying union members made (some of them, with overtime) 125,000$ dollars last year. Can you fucking believe that? And, and they are supposed to announce the stops they make, if their bus doesn't have one of the automated voice dealys...but most of the time they turn those things off...fucking people.


You may be wondering how Sigur Ros fits into this...well, the seasons are changing and to get through the long grey months...I listended all the way through the ( ) album last night at about 4 am...is amazing...not really you guys' pace, but you know.
Draper

Bill Frist's Skeletons
Nestled within this mostly positive David Brooks piece about Frist is a very weird fact: while in med school, he adopted pets and then killed them so he could experiment on their hearts. Uhhh...

Here's that story about the grave desecration in France I was telling you about, chief.

Marc

P.S.:Frist has term-limited himself out in 2006, giving him a pretty nice heard start on '08.

Death, Theft & Smilin' Joe

Death

Johnny Cash died yesterday at the age of 71...

John Ritter, age 54, also died yesterday...

Theft

Four Baltimore Ravens have been robbed in the last couple of months...

Smilin' Joe

Boy, George Will (Thanks for the original link Marc) really has a way of laying things out clearly. All my reservations about a Dean candidacy, reservations I've been trying to move to the back of my mind, are thrust to the forefront by Will. Lieberman's moderation is what best qualifies him for the Democratic nomination and it is also the albatross around his neck.

Tony

Yeah, It's 2:30AM And I'm Writing About Taxes
Wow. When you withdraw money from a 401k or IRA, it is taxed as normal income - when you contribute to one of these accounts, it doesn't count against your tax liability. Therefore, all the taxes that you would have paid on that income (contributed to a 401k) you still have to pay, but only when you withdraw - get it?

Anyway, the accrued deferred tax revenue on these things - to be paid as the baby boomers withdraw from them upon retirement - is 3 trillion dollars(with a 'T'). To put things in perspective, that's about the same size as the national debt. Talk amongst yourselves.

Marc

President Palpatine?
George Will on Lieberman's "Me or Dean" strategy.

Like Will says, if Dean takes Iowa and NH, then Gephardt and Kerry are done. But will Edwards give up, too? I think if those two guys are out, then Edwards will sell himself as the compromise candidate between Dean and Lieberman.

My guess is that Edwards stays at least until South Carolina, where he and Lieberman would split the anti-Dean vote. Will there be any stopping Dean after winning 3 primaries?

Marc Zogby

Well, do you, punk?
Feel lucky, Draper? Chiefs by 3 - how much are you willing to lose?

Marc the Greek

South Africa's Finest
Gary Anderson has a new job.

Marc

Acting and reacting
My feelings about 9/11 aren't entirely clear to me yet. In the scope of history, it's still a fresh event and nobody's really sure what it means yet. In twenty years we may look at that day as the begginning of a series of terrorist attacks, each one worse than the last. Or, it may be viewed as a wake-up call, the event that shook the Americans out of their post-Cold War slumber to the realization that its still a scary world and their a number of people in that world that would like to see alot of us dead. In this respect, the day could prove to be a sort of Pearl Harbor.

I haven't seen any of the news coverage today, because I've been at work all day, but I can imagine its nothing short of maudlin and garish. However, there is no escaping this day being used as a call-to-arms. The events of that day should lead to a reexamination of our country.

It's not scapegoating to say that because of 9/11, we need to get real in our pursuit of international terrorists. It's not scapegoating to say that becaue of 9/11, we have to begin a dialogue in this country about the balance between liberty and security. It's not scapegoating to say that because of 9/11, our priorities must change.

(For a look at the way the homeland security issue can be used in an election irresponsible, and dangerously, click here.)

The war in Iraq occured, in part, because of the events of 9/11. But it wasn't scapegoating and it wasn't diversionary. (Nor was it preemptive. Iraq was in the process of a twelve year breech of a UN resolution and the Saddam regime contributed to the instability in a region in which stability transaltes to saftey for the United States.) Whether Saddam Hussein had direct links to 9/11 is irrelevent at this point. The War on Terrorism isn't about isolated, targed response to only those responsible for the 9/11 attacks. It's about wiping out foreign and domestic threats to American security wherever we find them. Iraq posed a threat to American secuirty, and we took efforts to neutralize that threat. And while I don't think that attacking Iraq is going to stop terrorists from targeting this country, it was successful in two ways. It ridded the world of Saddam Husein and it served as the first step in a process of convincing potential terrorits that if you are even considering attacking us, we will retailiate with extreme prejudice.

The first and most important concern of any government is the security of its people. On 9/11 that security was breeched. If we fail to be moved to action by the events of that day, it will undoubtedly happen again.

Tony

9/11 Survivors Zinged
Greg Easterbrook is my hero: read this.

Marc

A Poem
See Draper - I'm not a complete Philistine.
First saw this on Little Green Footballs.

There Will Be No Peace

Though mild clear weather
Smile again on the shire of your esteem
And its colours come back, the storm has changed you:
You will not forget, ever,
The darkness blotting out hope, the gale
Prophesying your downfall.

You must live with your knowledge.
Way back, beyond, outside of you are others,
In moonless absences you never heard of,
Who have certainly heard of you,
Beings of unknown number and gender:
And they do not like you.

What have you done to them?
Nothing? Nothing is not an answer:
You will come to believe - how can you help it? -
That you did, you did do something;
You will find yourself wishing you could make them laugh,
You will long for their friendship.

There will be no peace.
Fight back, then, with such courage as you have
And every unchivalrous dodge you know of,
Clear in your conscience on this:
Their cause, if they had one, is nothing to them now;
They hate for hate's sake.

--W. H. Auden

Marc

Burrito hut.
Anyway...not really just, go here...

And please, don't attack me.

Dean-Clark 2004?
Howard Dean, who has been meeting with General Wesley Clark several times over the past few months, has asked the retired general to join his Presidential campaign, possibly as Vice-President, sources say. This is a bold move on Dean's part, but I like it. I think it goes toward answering some of the questions I blogged about yesterday. Clark has a speech to give in Iowa later this month where his intentions will probably be made known.

Democrats seem to get excited by candidates who don't know if they want to run, (see Mario Cuomo), but all Cuomo ever proved to be was a giant pain in the ass. If you want to be president, you've gotta want it, no questions asked. It's a humiliating, exhausting, mind-bogglin experience, and if you have any kind of chance, you can't allow yourself doubts. I'd rather have a candidate who knows what he wants and is willing to get it, then a diva who needs to be assured that his ass will be kissed by everyone he speaks to before he will even consider honoring his country by running for president.

Clark isn't the only candidate who's got supporters out there, despite their unknown (or in this case known) intentions. People want Gore. (Although, Gore may have set this site up himself, I haven't heard what he's been up to lately.)

The Gore website points to a recent Zogby poll indicating that people, by a 52 to 40 margin (8 undecided) think someone new deserves to be reelected. This is a typical polling question at about this point in the election cycle, but the results are a little misleading. Americans are both leary of extended stints in power, and naturally optimistic. As long as the question is status quo versus what might be, Americans tend to lean toward what might be. Until a pollster puts a opponents name in the question. Then, the President's record can be measured against something concrete (his potential opponents record) instead of whoever the respondent has in mind at the time of the question. Also, the other candidates negatives will drive up the Presidetns number. Right now 52% of the respondents think someone deserves to be elected. Replace that with a name (Dean, Kerry, Gephardt...) and that number's going down.

Since today is the 2nd anniversary of 9/11, and I'm such a stickler for flag etiquette, check out these rules.

Tony