You think this had anything to do with the invasion of Iraq? Of course, the Post gives credit for Libya's surrender of its WMD program to "punishing sanctions".
Marc
« | December 2003 | » | ||||
![]() |
||||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Marc
Marc
Fassel, who was an offensive coordinator with the Arizona Cardinals before he came to New York, is expected to find work next year, possibly with those same Cardinals. Regardless of the outcome of the two remaining games, Fassel will finish his career in New York as the third-winningest coach in franchise history. Although his career in New York included a Super Bowl appearance three years ago (where they were summarily destroyed by the Baltimore Ravens), Fassel was under pressure almost from the minute this season started. The team suffered a number of early injuries, including Tight End Jeremy Shockey, and attendence began to suffer toward the end of the season.
The Giants are looking at a number of replacements, including LSU coach Nick Saban, former Jaguars coach Tom Coughlin, and the Patriots' two coordinators: Romeo Crennel and Charlie Weis. Coughlin, Crennel and Weis were Giants assistants under Bill Parcells.
Tony
Horn, who in a USA Today interview last year about Terrell Owens' Sharpie stunt promised never to do such a thing, was chastised by his coach on the sidelines, but will receive no fine from the team. The league, however, is expected to fine or suspend him.
Even more disturbing then the call was the interview on the 6 pm Sportscenter with Dan Patrick where Horn took turns laughing off the stunt, offering bland and unfelt apologies for it and taking jabs at the league for not being any fun. While Patrick prodded, former Cowboys Wide Receiver and full time athlete fellator Michael Irving laughed it up with Horn and agreeded that no one, including the oppossing Giants, had been offended by the "phone call." The Giants, who have been in the tank so long that they wouldn't have cared if Horn had squeezed out a Cleveland Steamer on Jim Fossel's face, probably weren't offended. But lots of other people were, including myself, Kornheiser, Wilbon, Jaws, Dan Patrick, Sean Salisbury, inumerable sports writers and most importantly the majority of football fans.
Horn's stunt, which he claimed was designed to bring fun into the league, was in reality designed to lift the profile of Joe Horn. It has nothing to do with the Ickey Shuffle, the Dirty Bird or the Skins' Fun Bunch end zone cirlce. Those were all fun and mostly clever end zone celebrations that whole cities were able to get behind. They were also dances of good, Super Bowl-bound teams, something the Saints are certainly not.
In an attempt to find the silver lining, I should note that New York Jets coach Herm Edwards was so outraged by the stunt that he called the commissioner to voice his disgust. Edwards, however, is a dying breed of coaches who simply will not tolerate this kind of reprehensible behavior. New Orleans coach Jim Haslett, on the other hand, has looked the other way after his camera-ready sidline scolding of Horn, saying this about Horn in a Monday press conference: "He'll learn. He's only 32." Great, looks like I'm clear to be a dickhead at work for another 8 years.
Look, this is out of hand. The league should stiffen penalties to include suspension, as millionaire athletes wipe their asses with the $10,000 fine that will most likely be levied against Horn. In a sense, however, the league is helpless and the problem is much bigger than Horn and T.O. In fact, earlier on Sunday, T.J. Duckett, after scoring the lone Falcons touchdown in their 38 to 7 beating at the hands of the Colts, celebrated with a dance in the end zone, at a time when the oh-so-out-of-it Falcons were down by 25 points.
Undisciplined, over-paid, over-indulged athletes will continue to do and say whatever they want (see Lewis, Ray; Bryant, Kobe), as long as there are sycophantic hangers-on. It permeates the culture, and it's not going away. It is, dare I say, the Orndoff Principle as unstoppable force.
As Charleton Heston would say: My God.
Tony
Beyond the effect these decisions have on Senate buisness, the departures deliver a blow to a party who has been out of power for almost four years.
The only hope the Democrats may be able to cling to is a recent trend of voters deliberately splitting their ticket in order to produce divided government. According to authors V. Lance Tarrance, Walter De Vries and Donna L. Mosher, whose book Checked and Balanced (I have a copy) outlines this emerging phenomenon, there is a significant number of voters who purposefully split their ticket to prevent one-party rule. If the trend holds, Democrats may benefit. However, my guess is that divided government is a lot more attractive during peacetime, when political debate is dominated by how and where to spend taxpayer money. Now that foreign policy and homeland security are the two biggest issues, people may look for unified government to prevent gridlock, rather than encourage it. Something to chew on.
Tony
"We designed a gold jersey last year to wear when teams in hot weather cities make us wear black," Rooney said. "We showed it to the NFL, and they told us we could wear the jerseys at home, but not away ... so we never went through with it."But now, the NFL allows teams to wear alternate jerseys on the road if the home team wears white - setting the stage for this abomination:
"We would have worn them with the gold pants," Rooney said, "and I know what you're thinking ... but, trust me, the gold on gold went well together."Well, the Steelers have been playing like my 10th grade JV team, now they can look like them too.
Marc
But seriously, folks... In his post Tuesday, T-Bone linked to a very perceptive piece by Bill Kristol, who is rapidly approaching George Will op-ed god status. Kristol warns Republicans against misunderestimating Howard Dean, and makes a persuasive case for Dean's potential angle of attack:
But Dean will emphasize that he has never ruled out the use of force (including unilaterally). Indeed, he will say, he believes in military strength so strongly that he thinks we should increase the size of the Army by a division or two. It's Bush, Dean will point out, who's trying to deal with the new, post-Sept. 11 world with a pre-Sept. 11 military.There is daylight to the right of Bush on foreign policy. Dean has already hinted at his willingness to attack (rhetorically) Saudi Arabia for their lunatic anti-Semitism and support of terrorist organizations.
I think the real opportunity that Kristol points out is Dean's chance to make specific calls for strengthening the military - two more light infantry divisions, 100,000 more soldiers, whatever. What is Bush's rationale for NOT strengthening the military? Whatever happened to the two-war standard (the doctrine that the US military would be able to fight two medium-level wars at once)?
Kristol also points out Bush's potential vulnerability on the issue of the deficit and the LBJ-like spending by the GOP. Jeff Jacoby highlights some of the worst excesses in the Boston Globe (link from Danno):
-$325,000 for the construction of a swimming pool in Salinas, Calif.And one more reason to line up the City Council and shoot them down like dogs (link via Liz):
-$220,000 for the New Mexico Retail Association in Albuquerque
-$1.8 million for the Women's World Cup tournament
Marc
Wilbon takes a look at why nobody cares about the Heisman anymore. His answer basically boils down to a list of names:
Winners from 1974-1988 -- Ohio State's Archie Griffin (twice), Tony Dorsett, Earl Campbell, Billy Sims, Charles White, George Rogers, Marcus Allen, Herschel Walker, Mike Rozier, Doug Flutie, Bo Jackson, Vinny Testaverde, Tim Brown, Barry Sanders.
Winners from 1989 -- Andre Ware, Ty Detmer, Desmond Howard, Gino Torretta, Charlie Ward, Rashaan Salaam, Eddie George, Danny Wuerffel, Charles Woodson, Ricky Williams, Ron Dayne, Chris Weinke, Eric Crouch, Carson Palmer.
Tony
Prompted by lawmakers, the FCC is grappling with a decision it made to allow the use of the word "fuck" as long as it is used as an adjective and not a noun describing a sex act. Several members of Congress are seeking a reversal of the decision and attempting to clarify the FCC rules and institute tougher penalties for those that break them. In fact, Rep. Lamar S. Smith (R-Tex.) has sponsored legislation listing "eight words and phrases that could not be spoken on broadcast television without punishment." Now I don't know what the extra word is, but I'd sure in the fuck would like to find out.
The government is now splitting hairs about what words (and in what context) should be banned. The answer is simple. Get out of the censorship buisness all together. Think about all the time, money and energy that is wasted in order to prevent little Timmy from hearing the word "fuck" while he's watching Fox. Tell Timmy's mom to turn the fucking TV off, the government's not your babysitter. Why, without prosecuting "potty mouth," the government would probably be able to buy a couple pallets of lightbulbs. ZING!
Tony
My first example comes from the world of sports, where Kerry Collins criticized Bruce Smith through the New York media. Collins' consecutive game streak is over, largely because of a hit that Smith laid on him during last Sunday's Redskins - Giants game at Giant Stadium. Smith, whose sack of backup Jesse Palmer put him past Reggie White as the all-time sack leader later in the game, hit Collins after the play had been blown dead for a delay of game penalty. Should Smith have hit Collins? Probably not. Should Collins have whined about it to the press. NO. Trust me, you'd never see Johnny U or Billy Kilmer doing anything like that. GAULD!
Next comes word that Korey Stringer's family is being asked to pay the Minnesota Vikings $47,000 since their case against the team was thrown out of court. Stringer died of heat exhaustion during training camp before the team's 2001 season. His family then sued the team, doctors, the makers of his pads, virtually anybody they could, in an effort to make up for Stringer's lost salary. This is actually a gauld coming through the back door. I'm glad this family's gotta pay, but I'm gaulded by the whole damn situation. I don't think you can hold an NFL team responsible for the physical toll playing football takes on a person, even if that toll includes death. Football is a rough game, and often a cruel one. Stringer's family should have been more than satisfied with the benefits that I am sure they collect from the Player's union and their ability to trade on his name and likeness, which I'm sure they can make a few bucks out of. Playing professional football is an honor and a privlege, and not something that is gotten into lightly. Every player knows that the next play could bring the end of his career, or permanent damage or even death. I didn't see anybody suing the Chicago Bears when Dick Butkus retired and realized his hands were gnarled beyond recognition, or when Dick "Night Train" Lane would clothesline, rather than tackle, anybody who got in his path. GAULD!
Turning to the world of entertainment, MAD-TV is under fire from a postal employees union for an upcoming sketch in which postal employees argue over who has the right to "go postal" first. The postal workers are upset because the instances of workplace violence at post offices has droppped signficantly. They want their members to protest the show and for the sketch to not air on Saturday. Like most of the stuff on MAD-TV, I'm certain that this sketch is not funny and probably offensive and certainly simple-minded. However, this is America, and you have the right to be as unfunny and stupid and offensive as you want to be. You know, as long as you don't say "piss" or "shit" or anything. GAULD!
And now the biggie. The one that really got my blood boiling. Taking a cue from New York City and Montgomery County, among others, Ireland is trying to institute a ban on smoking in all workplaces, including pubs, by next year. If you visit this link, you'll note that several people seem to be in favor of the ban because it might help them quit smoking. I don't know if I even need to say this, but it's not the government's responsibility (even in Europe) to help you stop smoking. You know who I blame this one on: Baby Boomers.
Boomers, the demographic I hate less than old people but more than young people, have realized that all their years of recklessness have taken their toll and they can longer continue to behave the way they used to. They used to fuck anybody they wanted to, do whatever drug they could get their hands on and smoke and drink every day. But Boomers, who have a strangle hold on power in this country, have decided that since it's no fun to quit and stay sober by yourself, let's make everybody quit. Instead of people being able to make their own decisions, the Boomers have decided to outlaw any substance or activity that is harmful. Now that they've fucked all they can, done all thier drugs and smoked and drank until their throats were bloodied and sore, the party's over. GAULD!
Tony
On the other end of the coaching spectrum, Dan Reeves, the sixth winningest NFL Coach of all time, and winner of 201 games, resigned as the head coach of the Atlanta Falcons after being informed that he would be let go at the end of the season. Wade Phillips will take over until the Falcons get a new general manager who hires a coach during the off-season.
Tony
Groups from both ends of the political spectrum, including the NRA and the ACLU, joined together to denounce the decision as an unconstitutional infrigment on their First Amendment right to participate, and voice opinions, in the political process. NRA chairman Wayne LaPierre called the decision "the most significant change in the First Amendment since the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which tried to make it a crime to criticize a member of Congress."
To read it straight from the horse's mouth, click here. For some analysis, click here.
The overall goal of campaign fianance reformers is a system of publicly-funded campaigns, with the idea being that without money as a corrupting factor, politics will be cleaner and somehow better. Public financing would instead yield two disturbing side-effects. First, Congressional incumbants would be virtually unbeatable as a result of challengers not being able to raise and spend the money neccessary to overcome the considerable advantage of incumbancy. Second, the government would be forced to subsidize Congressional candidates who, because their message does not resonate with voters, are unable to raise the neccessary funds to launch a bid on their own.
One need only look at the success of the Howard Dean campaign to see that candidates can raise money, and be competative, through numerous small individual contributions. Dean is sitting on a goodly size amount of money, and yet has no odor of corruption about him. He was able to raise the money by having a clear message that a lot of people have responded to and a solid political organization able to harness simpatico feelings and turn them into campaign contributions.
In addition to winning the money primary, Dean has been able to win the endorsement primary, snagging, among others, Al Gore, Bruce Babbitt and several strong-armed unions with large ground operations in Iowa. Both Dean and Gore took some heat for Gore's endorsement from the Washington Post's David Broder and Richard Cohen. Broder didn't think it was proper for Gore to jump in when the race was still, at least in Broder's mind, tight. Take notice of the national polls Broder cites, which he knows are useless at this point of the game beause they ignore the role of momentum. Cohen took Gore to task for the class-less way he handled the situation, including not telling Joe Liebermann, Gore's former running mate and a man who stayed out of the race to his detriment until Gore made a decision about running, until well after the story had broke in the media. I don't usually like Cohen, but you're not going to get an argument from me about Gore being a jerk.
Tony
In other contact sport news, Steve Spurrier, who looks ridiculous in cold weather, will be back as the Redskins head coach next year. Both he and Snyder were very clear that speculation about Spurrier leaving, perhaps to Nebraska or UNC, were just that and he has no intention of leaving the Skins. If he stays, it will mark the first time since Snyder has owned the team that a head coach will enter his third season.
Finally, the Weekly Standard sticks up for Donovan McNabb this week, saying the allegations that he is overrated are not supported by stastical analysis. Quota-back no more? You make the call.
Tony
Tony