Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« January 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
foolishness
gloating
jerk fellation
LEGO
politics
schadenfreude
sports
Stinktown
work
We Three Jerks
Wednesday, 28 January 2004
Democrats say yes, we do want another liberal from Massachusetts
Taking most of the drama out of the Democratic Presidential nomination race, Senator John F. Kerry (D-MA) beat former Vermont Governor Howard Dean by twelve points in yesterday's New Hampshire Primary. (Click here for exit poll analysis) Kerry, whose surprise first place finish in Iowa one week ago helped to spur on this victory, is now comfortably embedded as the party's front-runner. The Dean campaign will have the money and organization that will enable them to challenge Kerry as the contest moves to a national stage, but the momentem is now solidly behind Kerry and Dean is facing a long uphill fight.

The other big story of the night was Senator John Edwards (D-NC), who did worse (at least in my opinion) than expected by coming in a very close fourth, behind Retired Army General Wesley Clark. Edwards spent part of yesterday deflecting reporters' suggestions that he's running for the Vice Presidency. I felt that a strong third-place finish for Edwards, one where he was closer to number two than four, would emnable him to get some sort of bounce out of New Hampshire as the race moves down South. Tuesdays' resutls showed, however, that Edwards was unable to deliver the knockout punch that takes Clark out of the race and winnows the field to Kerry, Dean and Edwards.

Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) failed to pull double digits in a state he had placed all of his resources in. I suspect poor finishes all around next Tuesday, and a signifcant lack of cash pushes Lieberman out of the contest by next Wednesday.

Personally, I had it Dean, Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman, Clark. So, you can take the rest of my commentary with a grain of salt if you'd like. I think Kerry can end any kind of serious challenge by placing a strong second in South Carolina (a state where he recently picked up the endorsement of Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), South Carolina's most powerful black politician) and a win in Missouri (where neighboring governor Tom Vilsack of Iowa will campaign for Kerry). Unless Kerry does something unimaginable, I think he'll be the clear nominee by next Wednesday. It wouldn't surprise me to see Dean compete for Super Tuesday votes, but I don't expect any kind of contested convention.

Tony

Posted by thynkhard at 1:47 PM EST
Updated: Wednesday, 28 January 2004 1:58 PM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink

Thursday, 29 January 2004 - 1:43 AM EST

Name: Marc

All Dean needs to do is be the last man standing to face Kerry after Feb. 3. If Kerry wins most of the races, everyone else is out. Then Dean could win two of three out of Michigan, Washington (Feb. 7), and Maine (Feb. 8), and trade wins with Kerry until March 2 (California, NY, Ohio, New England).


I think that people are going to get tired of Kerry (so did Joe Trippi, but then he just got fired) sooner or later. So far, there has been almost no media scrutiny of Kerry - but it will come. Mickey Kaus reports from New Hampshire:


Reporters dread the idea of spending the next six months covering Kerry (the expression "Shoot me now" was heard when his picture came on the screen). The only way out--the only way to make the race interesting--is to present voters with a ... fuller picture of the New Hampshire winner.

If Dean can stay in the race (and if everyone else gets out), he can wait for the media to tear Kerry down, and then ride the wave of late-deciding uninformed dingbat voters to victory March 2.


The problem with Kerry sweeping the next round of primaries is that every time he wins an election, by definition, he becomes more 'electable', which is his big (only?) appeal. John Ellis on Kerry:


More important, Kerry is not a constituency politician. He's self-created and actualized. There is no safety net beneath him, as there was for Reagan when he faltered in Iowa, as there was for Mondale when he lost New Hampshire, as there was for George W. Bush when he lost New Hampshire four years ago. Kerry has a base, but it's psychographic, not demographic. If he begins to slide, aging yuppies will not be the only ones to cut him loose.


So he needs to be the winner, because everybody loves a winner. And in order to be the winner, he has to make sure that no one else wins.


Ellis says Kerry's mission on Feb. 3 is to, in the immortal words of Lee Atwater, "shoot the wounded", and wrap un the nomintation. Is Dean resilient enough to ride out the streak of Kerry wins? Is Kerry the second coming of Ed Muskie or Al Gore (i.e. will people figure out that they hate him before or after he gets the nomination)?

Thursday, 29 January 2004 - 1:56 AM EST

Name: Marc

As Mickey Kaus says, "Let the turkey shoot begin!" (via TNR):


"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to the early use of military force by the US against Iraq. I share your concerns. On January 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work and against a resolution giving the president the immediate authority to go to war."

--letter from Senator John Kerry to Wallace Carter of Newton Centre, Massachusetts, dated January 22 [1991]


"Thank you very much for contacting me to express your support for the actions of President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the crisis and the policy goals he has established with our military deployment in the Persian Gulf."

--Senator Kerry to Wallace Carter, January 31 [1991]


View Latest Entries